Legal scholars Ed Meese, Gary Lason, and Steven Calabresi have filed a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court, challenging the constitutionality of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s appointment. Their argument revolves around Smith not being constitutionally appointed, advocating for the removal of his powers. The scholars assert that, according to the Constitution, only the President, with Senate confirmation, can appoint a Special Counsel. They highlight the absence of Senate confirmation for Smith, claiming his actions surpass constitutional authority. The scholars stress that Attorney General Merrick Garland’s appointment of Smith lacked both statutory and constitutional authorization, rendering Smith an unauthorized representative without constitutional authority. The Supreme Court’s decision will play a pivotal role in determining the fate of Smith’s role and actions.